After reading the articles last week about chat and noticing, I started thinking about the physical distance aspect of Internet communication (that is, the fact that conversation partners are usually not face-to-face and may never have seen each other).
We've talked about how chat can lower students' anxiety levels when it comes to producing L2 speech and in some ways I think the relative anonymity of Internet communication can definitely make people open up and communicate more and on a more personal level than they might in a face-to-face interaction, especially for some personality types.
However, I also wonder what this kind of communication means for identity. It seems that a lot of digital natives have online personas that are sometimes very different from their live personalities--and it's not always good. Look at the comments under most YouTube videos and you'll see a lot of people being haters for hating's sake. Would they do the same if faced with the immediate consequences of the interlocutor's reaction?
I feel like online communication changes a lot about etiquette, but the deeper issue for me is more about re-defining what it means to be human & have language...is conversation still
conversation if you can't see the person's face, look into their eyes, watch their expressions, hear their voice? Jin talked about losing her handwriting to computer fonts, and I feel that both penmanship and voices are unique, human markers that identify us and help our conversation partners (or pen pals) feel connected to an actual person. A lot of these things are involved in developing intercultural competence and I wonder if something will be lost when it's all digitized. What will the interpersonal communication rules be in the future?